Asymmetric meme - debunking Luis Benitez – Bribiesca's criticism of the Memetics

While it is highly imaginative, exploring that memes in each case with accuracy of replicated DNA could replicate how each individual subconscious brain functions physically separated from the other brains interpret phenomena in the environment produce an independent content generative cycle, relative correlations in the descriptive levels of not the less phenomena exist and because even counter-arguments in relativity produced the same phenomenon is observed, the same phenomenon under a parallel perception is observed.

So, although the descriptive level of the phenomenon is different, it doesn't mean that the appearance of the phenomenon could be replicating. If such person A has an idea Z with a description X and starts talking to person B, who interprets a description Y the idea is Z of still not-the-less under perception in the present level.If the person talking B idea of z with a person C, who produced again description X on the matter, C not the less some differences that make the description X a relative differences in the correlate with original sein.Die meaning the descriptive level of the phenomenon is as natural as differences in matters of taste, but although memes as asymmetric must be considered that only relative correlated (like logic dictated that entity with a complexity A may be B the entity that has a different complexity), if it a low replication accuracy and a high mutation rate nothing if nothing could be agreed rendering the scientific community itself not existent to be.

But what does parallel performance. Consider that a spring from the sky fell flew a gang of crows about us. The spring we perceive is one and the same, but the image of him conscious mind formed by both our separately, parallel. Is linked to the semantic content differently because I don't know the bird the spring came the names of species, and I also think that the spring a presentation on the art of nature.On the other hand have a descriptive other layer from the pen, and consider it as unhygienisch.Nachdem I will certainly instead the name of the type species of bird which comes the spring I can't think of any imaginary name for these types, but the name will later assign me if I another to find spring from the same species.So I'm looking forward to the same spring, but since I its semantic content differently perceive as you, this means that the same spring we observe in the environment does not exist if the semantic content in the descriptive level differs?

The author of the art of perception: An introduction to information reality (2008), divinity: A portrait of human spirituality (2010), path of eternal truth: practical science and contemporary philosophy of what Buddha himself taught of the path of enlightened in Dhammapada (2009), enlightened life of Buddhism: A workbook for interpreting 423 teachings of the enlightenment in Dhammapada (2009), the transcendental awareness of Buddha: A workbook for interpreting classes in Lankavatara Sutra and Diamond Sutra (2010), the divine Krishna: A workbook for interpreting classes in the Bhagavad Gita (2010), the undivided wisdom of Confucius: A workbook for interpreting the instruction in the Analects of Confucius (2010), and my Tao Te Ching: A workbook to interpret of the teachings and poems in Tao Te Ching (2010) .you find his published works from Amazon.com